Lesson 16 – 29th June 2009 – 1500 – 1 hour – Total so far – 17hours 33mins

Written by David Pollard on June 29th, 2009

Today’s lesson – more solo’ing. And thanks to Steve (the instructor), we got loads of video of it.

The lesson was basically in two halves. It consisted of 18 minutes of dual instruction with Steve and then the remaining 42 minutes of me on my lonesome.

With Steve onboard, I lifted off between 2 other helis, always an anxious moment, and then hover-taxi’ed to the Hover Square and did some taxi’ing to a point next to a concrete slab embedded in the grass where we put her down. We then did some liftoffs, and landings, with some 360′ turns, and after a couple of them went ok, we did some practice “engine failure in the hover”s. This is where Steve took over and I followed him through. They are very fast maneuvres, where Steve cuts the power and then uses loads of right pedal, a little cyclic and then some collective to cushion the landing, but all in the space of 2 seconds.

I find them very daunting, and when it came to my turn, I was piss poor. I did some right pedal (I remember that much), and I know I touched the collective in some way, but I am pretty sure Steve took over and saved the day. So, after 3 of them, 1 of which I “did”, Steve left the helicopter and it was my turn to practice some take offs, landings, hover turns, hover taxi-ing, etc…

So, the instructions were clear. I had to imagine a rectangle on the ground (75m long, 20m wide) and liftoff, 90′ turn, fly to the 20m corner, 90′left turn, fly to the 75m corner, 90′left turn etc etc until I was back at the concrete slab where I was to land next to the slab. And rinse and repeat.

Steve kindly offered to film it with my camera so he got some great footage.

My liftoffs are feeling much better and although I wouldn’t say I’ve cracked them by a long shot, I do feel they are controlled and relatively stable. My 90′ turns are a bit messy, my hover-taxi’ing is iffy, not very straight lines, and my landings, well, improvement needed FOR SURE. I seem to have a mental block on “touching down (landing)”. I remember (from my fixed wing days), I always wanted to go for the lightest kiss of a landing, and would flare endlessly, until I virtually stalled the a/c onto the ground albeit from 2 inches up.

Without realising it, I seem to have this mental subconscious attitude of doing a similar thing in the helicopter. I asked Steve later, if I was being too much of a fanny, but he seemed to suggest that there’s nothing wrong in getting it spot on. So, in some of the video, the landings last quite a while ;-)

I really enjoyed the lesson. It’s a wonderful feeling being on your own, and in control of your own life. Once you lift off, you really are on your own, and noone can help you. Steve told me to keep the hover high, and I thought I was. To me, they felt 5-10 feet off the ground, but after the first flying of the rectangle, Steve gave me a sign to say “Higher”. In my head, I went higher, but they still appear quite low to me when I watch them back. Bear in mind the grass is probably 2 feet tall, so it’s not as dangerous as it looks, well, I didn’t think so.

I think the wind situation made the whole thing a lot easier too. The winds being variable (direction) at 3 knots.

So, absolutely cracking 1 hour of flying, and to top it all off, the landing at the end was between 2 helicopters and was the kiss of a landing that I had longed for. Always a nice way to end.

Here’s where I parked G-MAVI (the middle one)…….

dpparking

So, the video……

First Liftoff

First Landing

Second Liftoff

Second Landing

Third Liftoff

Fourth Liftoff

Final (and worse) landing (must have been getting tired)…

While, I remember. When two aircraft have a near miss, there is a facility the CAA provide to report it. It’s called an Air Prox(imity) report.

They tend only to be filed if one party believes another party is at fault, but at the moment, it seems that all parties (Merlin, Us, and Newcastle Radar) are happy it was one of those rare things where noone was at fault.

The Flight Lieutenant of the Merlin was happy not to file one. Steve feels the same and Newcastle Radar seem to be happy that all parties were a victim of faster than anticipated weather changes.

However, the Wing Commander (the boss of the Flight Lieutenant who was piloting the Merlin) was sitting in the back seat and he has a different opinion apparently. So, we’ll have to see what happens, but the Merlin had 2 instrument rated pilots on board and instruments that allow it to fly in cloud, so an argument could be made that they should have been flying IFR (by their instruments in or above cloud). Interestingly, after this incident, they subsequently went IFR upto 3000′.

We’ll see.

2 Comments so far ↓

  1. Hamish says:

    With respect to Airprox, it is actually if the commander of any of the aircraft (or ATC0 feels that the proximity of another aircraft may have compromised safety. It is not about apporioning blame, or finding who is ‘at fault’. We have an open reporting culture in the UK the idea being that lessons can be learned. If it was as close as you said, and if it made your heart race, well ….. here is the CAA definition ..

    http://www.airproxboard.org.uk/default.aspx?catid=423&pagetype=90&pageid=5635

  2. David Pollard says:

    Thanks for that Hamish !!!

    No shadow of a doubt that this is an Air Prox worthy of recording and good to know that there is an open reporting culture – definitely a plus for safety.

    Will speak to Steve (instructor, a/c commander) and recommend reporting for lessons to be learned.

Leave a Comment